Corresponding author: Daniel Mietchen ( daniel.mietchen@ronininstitute.org ) © Shweata Hegde, Ayush Garg, Peter Murray-Rust, Daniel Mietchen. This is an open access preprint distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Citation:
Hegde SN, Garg A, Murray-Rust P, Mietchen D (2022) Mining the literature for ethics statements: a step towards standardizing research ethics. ARPHA Preprints. https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e94687 |
Ethical aspects of research are steadily receiving more attention, from descriptions of research that is proposed to be done to the documentation of ongoing research to reports about research already performed. One of the ways in which this trend manifests itself is the increasingly common addition of ethics statements to publications in fields like biomedicine, psychology or ethnography. Such ethics statements in publications provide the reader with a window into some of the practical yet typically hidden aspects of research ethics. As more and more publications are becoming available in full text and in machine readable formats through repositories like Europe PubMed Central, we propose to mine the literature for ethics statements and to extract information about the various aspects of research ethics that they address. The more standardized these statements are, the better the mined materials can be converted into structured and queryable information that can in turn be used to inform efforts towards higher levels of standardization in research ethics. This paper sketches out the motivation for such mining and outlines some methodological approaches that could be leveraged towards this end.